In June 2010, native Dallas resident, Robert Kam, age 60, was diagnosed with Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer. In Feb of 2011, Robert Kam completed an irrevocable trust with the benefits made known to all heirs. At that time all the assets, except for a small house keeping bank account, were signed over to the Trust and under the full control of the Trustee. All parties agreed that Robert had “mental capacity” at this time and the Trust reflected Robert's wishes.
By early March, 2011, Robert Kam's health significantly deteriorated. He had lost complete use of his Kidneys 4 months earlier and required frequent dialysis to remain alive. He was totally blind from Glaucoma in one Eye and had limited vision in his second eye with the use of a coke bottle thick lens. He had a valve inserted into his stomach 2 months earlier to periodically remove fluid build up, his liver had limited function, and he was on an “unlimited prescription of narcotics” for pain control. During the entire month of March 2011, Robert Kam had no idea which planet he was on from the narcotic intake. He was unable to walk without assistance and continually wore diapers. He required 24 hour care and had an attention span of 2 minuites. The M.D. Anderson Pancreatic doctor who reviewed the Baylor medical reports for an upcoming trial confirmed that Robert Kam lost mental capacity the first week in March 2011.
Page 1
1] Carol Kam is a valid uncontested undisputed heir for $ 10 K in the Robert S Kam Trust created by Robert Kam on February 2011. This Trust is Irrevocable, fully funded by Feb 18, 2011 and was known to all beneficiaries. This Fully Funded, Active, Irrevocable Trust was created when all beneficiaries, all friends, all family members, and the Medical Records confirmed that Robert Kam had capacity.
Page 12] Carol Kam is also an uncontested, undisputed heir for $10K in the
illegal Amendments to the Robert S Kam Trust created in secret by attorney David Pyke on March 17, 2011 when Robert S Kam failed to have capacity per Robert's failure to recognize his heir at that time, per the medical Records, per the M.D Anderson Oncologist who reviewed the Medical Records and by numerous Friends and Family members. These Amendments significantly increased the benefits to David Pyke's Client and added her 4 children as beneficiaries at the expense of the benefits to Robert Kam's two sons.
3] Robert Kam, a Pancreatic Cancer patient died while being loaded into a car for Dialysis on March 28, 2011.
4] The Amendments, illegally created by David Pyke, were not presented to the beneficiaries until the Funeral for Robert on April 1, 2011.
5] Carol Kam initiated an investigation of the work by David Pyke and confirmed it was illegal and improper. She notified the other heirs of this research.
6] Upon awareness of Carol Kam's investigation, David Pyke instructed the Trustee to not pay Carol Kam her uncontested, undisputed inheritance of $10K.
7] In July 2011 one of Robert Kam's sons, who was severely negatively affected by David Pyke's improper work, filed suit to negate the illegal amendments to the Active, Fully funded, Irrevocable Trust created at a time when Robert Kam had capacity.
8] A trial was held in July 2013, that was to determine if the Trustee was to follow the original, fully funded, irrevocable trust created by Robert Kam while he had capacity or the illegal “Amendments” to the Robert S Kam Trust created in secret by David Pyke. All parties agreed that Carol Kam was a valid uncontested undisputed heir for $10 K and that she had not been paid by the Trust even though Robert Kam had passed over 2 years earlier.
9] Per the agreement between Judge Michael Miller and John Peyton on July 15, 2013, prior to the trial, John Peyton used the Sanctity of the Court
Page 2
system to punish Carol for criticizing the completely improper conduct of
David Pyke. Peyton maliciously removed her as an heir and charged her $226,000 legal fees as additional penalty. This ruling was not supported by any court testimony, any fact, and was not requested by the Defendant.
There was no legal basis to remove Carol Kam as an heir, no legal basis to penalize Carol Kam for seeking her undisputed and uncontested inheritance. The sole basis is Michael Miller and John B Peyton Jr's plan to severely punish Carol Kam for flagging the misconduct and unprofessional activity of David Pyke for amending an active, irrevocable, fully funded Trust created by Robert Kam when all parties agreed he had capacity.
A collection of Fifth Graders can quickly assess the complete illogic of the ruling against Carol Kam.
Unfortunately the embedded Culture of Cover within the Texas Legal system has prevented a fair logical resolution of this case. The perversion of Justice in the Texas Legal system is profound.
The ONLY explanation for the ruling and continued burden on Carol Kam is pure unadulterated Fraud and the clear absence of a responsible adult in the Texas Legal system The State spends hundreds of millions of dollars on a system intended to resolve legitimate conflicts and there is no one in charge The “buck” has no place to stop.
My prior submittal in 2013 to your shop fully documented this severe abuse of the sanctity of the court system, mulitple violations of Law AND violations of the Code of Conduct for Texas Judges . Approximately 10 months after I submitted this fully documented complaint, the Commission claimed that there was no problem with the conduct of Miller, Peyton and Wilmouth. As my submittal was fully documented, I then asked for a list of any deficiency / deficiencies in my submittal with no response from this Commission.
It appears that the Commission, at that time based rulings primarily on whether or not the conduct becomes public knowledge. Peyton was removed a few years later after a magazine article came out on his affair
Page 3
with a probate attorney during a trial. I had submitted more than enough information to remove Peyton earlier, yet that information was ignored by this Commission.
Our family learned a lesson on how this Commission operates and and we now have two active web sites, Culture of Cover.com and Texas Probate Commission.com to inform the public. We also have two products currently available, “Fillmore “ in brown, printed on white Fruit of the Loom underwear to document the cover provided the Dallas Probate Courts [The most corrupt / inept courts in the State of Texas] by Robert Fillmore from the Fifth Court of Appeals. We just released “Fairies at the Fifth” commemorative coins recognizing the Fraud and Fantasy employed by the Fifth Court of Appeals to provide judicial favors.
We will soon present the script for the upcoming trilogy of this case entitled “Culture of Cover” which will fully documents the misconduct and fraud used by the Court system to cover for misconduct by Officers of the Court at the expense of innocent Texas citizens. Our family is confident that this will generate the press required to encourage this commission to provide a complete investigation.
Margaret Jones Johnson had a chance to correct the travesty of this case in the Bill of Review presented to her in 2015. She consulted with John Peyton after the hearing and he encouraged her to rule against Carol even though she knew, as Miller did 2 years earlier, that the Peyton Orders were counter to the facts in the case and represented pur Judicial Fraud.
Margaret Jones Johnson knew then and knows to this day that the Peyton Orders are a complete Fraud yet she has no spine, no backbone, and no senses of ethics to address it. It is truly amazing that she can even walk upright.
Margaret Jones Johnson instructed her staff not to accept Carol's initial Response to Fisher's requst for the hearing claiming that Carol had legal representation. This excuse was pure bull shit by Margaret Jones Johnson as Carol has not had representation before the Dallas Probate Court [The most corrurpt Court in the State of Texas] since 2015.
Page 4
Jones Johnson oversaw the hearing in 2022 when Carol was clearly Pro Se at this hearing when Fisher asked that Jones Johnson sign a second order to legitamize the 2013 unsigned Peyton Orders. Jones Johnson was fully aware of Carol as Pro Se. As a side note, Carol's Attorney in the original trial and in the Bill of Review, S. George Alfonse, was so disgusted with the unprofessional Conduct in the Dallas Probate Court [The most corrupt Court in the State of Texas] that he has never represented any other party entering that clown show since 2015. Subsequent attorneys have commented to Carol, that Carol's problem is clearly Fraud and gross misconduct by the Court and it is not in the best interest of the attorney or their firm to enter a court room and argure that the Dallas Probate Court is “THE FRAUD” in this case. Carol was able to submit her response to the Court on December 8, 2025 just prior to the December 10th hearing. Jones Johnson was scheduled and posted to oversee the hearing on December 10, 2025. Brenda Hull Thompson instead shows up, without providing Carol Kam any Order or Referral authorizing her to oversee the hearing. Brenda Hull Thompson denied Carol's request to read her full response to the Defendant's Motion to get it into the oral record. Brenda Hull Thompsom claims that she was ...”familiar with this case...” [Page 7, line 9 of the Transcripts]. This was a complete lie. There is no honest ethical Probate Judge who is aware of the travesty of ths case would support any effort to extract money from an uncontested, undisputed, unpaid valid heir, in an estate. It is obvious that the spineless Margaret Jones Johnson did not have the backbone and integrity to oversee the hearing she scheduled to attend. If Brenda Hull Thompson, in fact was fully aware of this case and stlll chose to attend and continue the Fraud she has got to be the dumbest Judge
Page 5
in the History of Texas. No Judge of any intellect and any character would knowingly step into the pile of shit created by Miller, Peyton, and Jones Johnson. I encourage this commission to: Confirm the authority of Brenda Hull Thompson for the December 10, 2025 hearing as none was provided to Carol Kam. Ask Brenda Hull Thompson on her claimed knowledge of the case. She never read Carol's Response and consistently interrupted Carol when she attempted to present it. She obviously never reviewed any of the voluminous files on the case that go back to 2011. Brenda Hull Thompson is a ball face liar and had no business sitting in on a 15 year old case, she had no knowledge of, for the spineless Margaret Jones Johnson. From the Transcripts you can see that Brenda Hull Thompson claims that Carol is responsible for her 15 year journey through the State Court System. This shows that Brenda Hull Thompson is a blithering idiot or as noted earlier, she has absolutely no understanding of the case and had no business to be in the courtroom to oversee the hearing. How can it be Carol's Fault that the Clown show at the Dallas Probate Court [The most corrupt Court in the State of Texas] failed to sign the order until 9 years after the 30 day statutory due Date on the Order? To this date, no Texas court, at any level, has provided any Statutory Law, Case Law or Rational basis for a subsequent Judge of a Court to Sign an order created by an Associate Judge, who failed to have permission to be in the courtroom, whom the State of Texas has deemed incompetent, over 9 years after a 30 day statutory due date. Through out the hearing, Brenda Hull Thompson repeatedly lectured Carol that Probate Law is complicated and she needs Counsel. Carol has over Over 15 years of experience in the Texas and Federal court System, with two Petitons to the U.S Federal Supreme Court, four Petitions and a Writ of Mandamus to the Texas Supreme Court, and significant input into the Texas Legislature to create Standard Probate Form for Texas Families now on the Texas Probate Commission and the Texas Supreme Court Websites and recent legislation to increase over sight of Judges via this Commission.
Page 6
As a Judge, Brend Hull Thompson is suppose to be the smartest person in the room with respect to Probate Law and should have no need for an attorney to explain the Law to her. She also not only has the right to address Fraud by the Court, she has the Duty to address Fraud in and by the Court, which she failed to do. Brenda Hull Thompson is actually is the one that desperately needs Counsel to assist her in assessing Texas Probate Law and Judicial Responsibilty. 1] Ask Brenda Hull Thompson if a timely and valid Order of Referral was required for Peyton to enter the Courtroom for each hearing. Ask Brenda Hull Thompson why there is no valid, timely order of Referral for either hearing that Peyton over saw. 2] Ask Brenda Hull Thompson why Peyton and Fisher never provided a signature line for Miller on the proposed Peyton Orders. 3] Ask Brenda Hull Thompson why Miller never signed the Peyton Orders. Remember that Miller, Peyton, and Fisher had over 100 years of combined experience in Dallas Probate Courts at the time the orders were created. The Omission of Miller's signature was not a Rookie mistake but an intentional act of Fraud and Collusion. 4] Ask Brenda Hull Thompson what law would allow a “subsequent” probate judge to sign an Associate Judge's order over 9 years after a 30 day statutory due date. 5] Ask Brenda Hull Thompson if it is appropriate for a Judge, with no knowledge of a case, to even sign off on an order over 9 years after a 30 day statutory due date. 6] Ask Brenda Hull Thompson how an active, fully funded, irrevocable Trust, created at a time when all parties and the Medical Records confirmed the author had full capacity, can be modifed, 7] Ask Brenda Hull Thompson if one has to know all their heirs and have full knowledge of their estate at the time a trust is created. If Robert had
Page 7
Full capacity at the time of the alleged signing of Pyke's Trust Amendments why was there a need to create an additional Amendment by Pyke to add Carol back in and why did the Trust have to fight an additional Lawsuit with Pyke's Client on a 6 figure Bank Account Pyke intentionally omitted from the Amended Trust that was intended solely for Robert Kam's' two sons. [DC-14-04228]. Pyke is a complete Dufus for this conduct. The answer is black and white that Robert did not have capacity to create Pyke's Amendment to the Trust. 8] Ask Brenda Hull Thompson the legal and or rational logic of removing an uncontested, undisputed heir for a fixed amount who had not been paid over two years after the benefit was due. 9] Ask Brenda Hull Thompson why James Fisher and David Pyke were not sanctioned for not paying Carol Kam her undisputed inheritance prior to any legal Action. As officers of the Court, Fisher and Pyke had a professional duty to keep all unnecessary disputes out of the legal system. They not only failed to do this but actually used the Court system to harrass Carol Kam. This Harrassment has continued for over 15 years. 10] Ask Brenda Hull Thompson if she has ever removed an undisputed uncontested heir for an undisputed amount from an estate. 11] Ask Brenda Hull Thompson how a Judge can unilaterally remove an heir with no supportive testimony or documents when no party requested it at anytime, at any hearing. 12] Ask Brenda Hull Thompson if it is appropriate for a Dallas Probate Attorney to instruct his staff to sign as witnesses to a Pediatrician's signature on a State Promulgated DNR [Do Not Resuscitate Form] when the Pediatrician was never in the attorney's office … and the Pediatrician was not the attending physician and never treated Robert Kam 13] Ask Brenda Hull Thompson if an individual with stage IV Pancreatic Cancer, on dialysis, with a valve inserted into his stomach to periodically drain it, with failing Liver, with a documented blood pressure reading of 69 / 41, who was totally blind in one eye and only had limited vision in the
Page 8
remaining eye via a Coke bottle lens, who was on unlimited Narcotics to control the pain, who had a documented attention span of 2 minutes, who wore diaper 24 hours, who required full time 24 hour care, who could not walk unassisted, who did not know what planet he was on, whom a Pancreatic Oncologist from M.D. Anderson confirmed he had lost capacity two weeks prior to the alleged signing of the Pyke's Trust Amendments, whom Pyke Admitted in court testimony that Robert did not have capacity 7 days prior to the alleged signing, had capacity to know his heirs and all his properties as required to create a valid Trust. 14] Ask Brenda Hull Thompson if she believes that this organization erred in confirming that John Peyton is incompetent to be a Judge in the state of Texas. 15] Ask Brenda Hull Thompson if it is appropriate for Fisher to maliciously and intentionally harrass Carol Kam for over 10 years by filing an Abstract of judgement on based on an invalid Court Order? 16] Ask Brenda Hull Thompson if she reviewed any Court records or transcripts for the original two hearings by Peyton on this Case. Brenda Hull Thompson exhibited no knowldge of the facts of this case, no understanding of Probate Law and no respect of law addressing the conduct of an officer of the court. From the Transcripts Brenda Hull Thompson ball faced lied to the Court “Page 7, line 9...I am familiar with this case . Then admitted in line 11 that she was unqualified to hear this case as “.. I am not intimately familiar with 15 years of litigation.” Brenda Hull Thompson had no qualification to be in that courtroom for that hearing” On Page 9 lines 22 to 23 Attorney James Fisher claimed that “Almost everything that Ms Kam just said to this court was factually untrue”. Prior to Fisher making this claim, Carol stated
Page 9
1] She contested a will changed 10 days prior to her brother's passing [Page 4, lines 18 and 19.. TRUE 2] I have been harrassed Page 6, line 6 Discussed in this presentation by Pyke, Fisher, Peyton and, Jones Johnson. TRUE Page 6, line 25 and page 7 line 1, I was awarded $ 10,000 they won't give it to me, an undisputed $ 10,000” TRUE Page 7, Lines 14, 17, 20 “This case is all based on Fraud”...I did prove it...My attorney proved it in court..” TRUE Page 7, line 24 to Page 8, line 2 ”We had a medical M.D. Anderson Doctor testify..... and we had an associate judge that heard the case that has now been disbarred as a judge” TRUE As an officer of the Court, Fisher has an obligation to be truthful and this statement was completely misleading as all of Carol's statements were TRUE. Fisher claimed that Carol lost in numerous State and Federal Courts. Each of these courts claimed that the unsigned Peyton Orders were Final State Orders which the Dallas Appeal Court and the Texas Supreme Court finally acknowledged in 2020 were in fact not final Orders as Miller had failed to sign them within the 30 day Statutory deadline. Pro Se Carol was right all along and ALL THE JUDGESAND ALL THE COURTS were wrong on an issue that a fifith grader could figure out. Fisher also claimed Carol lost in District Court 116. This is misleading. The Judge of this Court, Tonya Parker graciously granted Carol Kam three hearings and after the third hearing, Parker acknowledged that she did not feel she had authority over this Probate Case but did acknowledge that the Texas Court system had completely failed to provide justice to Carol in accordance with Texas Law. Tonya Parker publically apologized on behalf of the State of Texas for the failure of the Texas court system to provide Carol her rightful inheritance and judicial proceedings based on fact and law.
Page 10
James Fisher also failed to mention that Carol did prevail Pro Se in a petition to the Supreme Court [16-0350] instigated by Pyke who failed in his attempt to deny Carol her Father's inheritance. Carol's Father's Estate was maliciously contested by Pyke via Dallas Probate Court #2. Fortunately this case was submitted to a real Appeal Court in El Paso who made a ruling in favor of Carol based on Fact and Law. It was not sent to the “Fairies” at the Fifth court of Appeals” where rulings are based on Fraud and Fantasy. Carol's Pro Se record of success is 100% when the case is presented to an honest court. While this complaint is directed at the Spineless Margaret Jones Johnson and the completely Clueless Brenda Hull Thompson [DUMB AND DUMBER] the original instigator of this mess can quickly resolve it. This commission failed in 2013 to do their job but now has a second shot. At this time John B Peyton Jr [DUMB ASS] is still alive and this commission shall immediately interview Peyton for an explanation of his conduct and the agreement he made with Miller and Jones Johnson in 2013 and 2015. He has been removed and retains immunity. Hopefully he is willing to clear his conscious prior to passing and honor his profession. This case is a huge embarrassment for the entire Texas Legal system. Time is of the essence to preserve any integrity in the Texas Legal System. Ask Peyton the following with the assistance of a qualified lie detector: A] What Agreement did he make with Michael Miller on July 15, 2013 to have Peyton replace Miller as the Trial Judge for the July 22, 2013 trial and the October 15, 2013 rehearing. B] Ask how this substitution can be made 7 days prior to a trial when state law requires 10 day notice to all parties. C] At this time of this trial in 2013. Miller, Peyton and Fisher had a combined experience of 100 years in Probate Court. They all knew that Miller's signature was required. Ask Peyton why was Miller's signature not
Page 11
on any Order he created in 2013 as required by state law to be signed within 30 days of creation. D] Ask why he did not provide an Order of Referral to any Party at any hearing. E] Ask why he entered the Courtroom for both hearings without an Order of Referral. F] Ask him of his justification to remove an uncontested heir, for an undisputed amount, documented in either trust document, and who had not been paid in two years. G] Ask why Pyke and Fisher were not sanctioned for not paying Carol her undisputed uncontested inheritance prior to any hearing. H] Ask him how can an attorney amend, in secret, without notifying any other beneficiary or a court, an active, fully funded, irrevocable trust created when all parties agreed Robert Kam had capacity. I] Ask how is it appropriate to significantly increase the benefit of a single heir and add her children in secret by “Amendment” to an active, fully funded irrevocable trust. J] Ask him how he can judge the capacity of a pancreatic cancer patient who he has never seen when the medical records, and the only Medical Doctor in the courtroom, confirmed Robert Kam failed to have capacity at the time the Amendments were first presented by Pyke K] Ask how can a person be deemed to have capacity when he failed to recognize his heirs at the alleged signing of the Amendment to the active, fully funded, irrevocable trust. L] Ask why Carol's Attorney was not permitted to depose the Pediatrician who allegedly signed the DNR for Robert Kam. This pediatrician who never saw Robert Kam and this Pediatrician who was never in Pyke's office, yet Pyke's paralegals illegally signed as witnesses to this Pediatrician's signature
Page 12
All of the above violate the Code of Conduct for Judges to “ …. respect and honor the judicial office as a public trust and strive to enhance and maintain confidence in our legal system. The judge is an arbiter of FACTS AND LAW for the resolution of disputes and a highly visible symbol of government under the rule of law” [Preamble] Canon #1 “An independent and honorable judiciary is indispensable to justice in our society. A judge should participate in establishing, maintaining and enforcing high standards of conduct and should personally observe those standards so the the integrity and independence of the judiciary is preserved” Canon #2 “A judge shall comply with the law and should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary”. Once you get these answers you will see that John Peyton [DUMB ASS] conspired with Miller to use the sanctity of the court solely to protect the incompetence attorney David Pyke at the expense of an innocent Texas Citizen. You will find Margaret Jones Johnson [DUMB] completely Spineless and unsuited to be a judge. You will also see that Brenda Hull Thompson [DUMBER] is a complete liar and has disgraced the legal system by over seeing a hearing she has no knowledge of and was not qualified to preside over. An apology from Peyton, Jones Johnson, and Thompson to Carol Kam and the State of Texas will be in order.
Page 13